Category Archives: Ethics & Metaethics

Call for submissions to the Christian Carnival: #INHUMAN

Calling all bloggers:  Wednesday, May 1st, 8am-8pm, will you please publish and/or tweet (across all your social networks) a post on late-term abortion, using the #INHUMAN hashtag?   There is going to be an #INHUMAN tweetfest: https://www.facebook.com/events/118639345001205 Here are a selection of pro-life … Continue reading

Posted in Carnival, Gosnell | Leave a comment

#Gosnell tweets you are free to snag

Please use these tweets to spread awareness about the Kermit Gosnell trial. Fill in any leftover characters by hash-tagging local and main stream media, and your politicians. Join the #inhuman Tweetfest Wednesday, May 1, 8am-8pm. ***For tweet coverage on Gosnell … Continue reading

Posted in Gosnell | Leave a comment

Why do I tweet so much about #Gosnell?

Before I heard about the Gosnell murder trial, I posted very rarely on abortion, out of sensitivity to the women who have made such a painful choice. I also figured there was no point swimming against the unchangeable culture-of-death tide … Continue reading

Posted in Gosnell | Leave a comment

"Objections to Faith" by David Spikes (12 yrs. old)

Sometimes people have objections about Christianity, such as “a loving God would never send people to hell,” or “since evil and suffering exist, a good God cannot,” or “miracles contradict science, so they cannot exist.” One objection is that a loving … Continue reading

Posted in Apologetics Toolbox, Problem of Evil & Hell | Leave a comment

Rejecting grace because the evil don’t pay?

Do you reject grace because you want people to pay for evil? Remember: You are relatively good by comparison to evil, but not by comparison to Perfect. (retweet) When we stop loving/forgiving, it is because we stopped acknowledging God’s love … Continue reading

Posted in Problem of Evil & Hell | Leave a comment

The Moral Argument

Update 1/30:  Expanded on some things The Moral Argument I don’t like the traditional version of this argument that argues from the moral law to a moral law-giver: Traditional Argument from Morality Premise 1:  There is an objective moral law. Premise … Continue reading

Posted in Apologetics, Apologetics Toolbox, Divine Essentialism, Euthyphro Dilemma, Golden Rule, Is-Ought Fallacy, Natural Law and Divine Command | 4 Comments

Poll: What grounds objective moral truth?

Choose one option from this poll: God wills the good in accordance with his loving nature. The good is a construct of God, man or nature. Nothing, there are only constructs which do not obligate. In other words: What grounds … Continue reading

Posted in Apologetics Toolbox, Divine Essentialism, Euthyphro Dilemma, Is-Ought Fallacy, Natural Law and Divine Command | Leave a comment

Groothuis’ "Christian Apologetics" ch.15: The Moral Argument

Chapter 15 of Groothuis’ Christian Apologetics is on the Moral Argument, although it only briefly covers it in one of its sections.  It covers much more ground as a nice introduction to Ethics, without going into specific theories (consequentialism, et cetera).   Two … Continue reading

Posted in Apologetics, Euthyphro Dilemma, Groothuis' 'Christian Apologetics', Reviews and Interviews | Leave a comment

Dialogue with Tristan Vick on the Golden Rule

In this Euthyphro Dilemma thread I began a dialogue with Tristan Vick, which I continue in this Golden Rule thread, and bring to the top in the thread you are now reading. Tristan replies: With 1)God commands/reveals in accordance with … Continue reading

Posted in Euthyphro Dilemma, Golden Rule | Leave a comment

Dialogue on Euthyphro’s Dilemma with Tristan Vick and Mike D

Update 10/16:  I’ve added my reply to the end of this post.  Thanks. :) Backstory of this dialogue:   1.  I posted the “Dear Euthyphro” meme on the Facebook page for Christian Apologetics Alliance.  The meme reads: Dear Euthyphro,  God … Continue reading

Posted in Euthyphro Dilemma | 7 Comments