Category Archives: Apologetics

Good without God?

Under every billboard of the sort above, should be the following one (click to get it on its own page)…

Posted in Divine Essentialism, Euthyphro Dilemma, Evil as Privation of Good, Golden Rule, Is-Ought Fallacy, Natural Law and Divine Command | 2 Comments

WLC’s case for the resurrection

This is an attempt to give a brief case for the evidence of Jesus’ resurrection, gleaned from Dr. William Lane Craig’s “Reasonable Faith” and “On Guard”.   I tinkered w/ it only a bit.  One example is that I took from … Continue reading

Posted in Apologetics, Apologetics Toolbox, William Lane Craig | Leave a comment

Where I am at with Hume’s is-ought distinction

The Scottish philosopher David Hume (May 7, 1711-August 25, 1776) lays out the is-ought problem, in book III, part I, section I of his A Treatise of Human Nature (1739).  Hume says ought-statements are “entirely different” from is-statements and, in … Continue reading

Posted in Examiner.com Articles, Is-Ought Fallacy | 2 Comments

Why does Sam Harris’ "Moral Landscape" have the word "moral" in it?

I actually have ‘two’ questions (followed by a more important ‘third’ question). 1.  Why does Sam Harris’ “Moral Landscape” have the word “moral” in it? and… 2.  Why doesn’t its sub-title say “How science can likely determine human values”? Really, I … Continue reading

Posted in Examiner.com Articles, Sam Harris | 2 Comments

Outside the Box: on the ‘extended mind’ hypothesis by Christopher Norris

Philosopher Christopher Norris, whose book Epistemology is discussed here on Ichthus77, has granted me permission to post the following as a guest post and enter it into the most recent Philosophers’ Carnival.  It was written a couple weeks back and … Continue reading

Posted in Carnival, Norris' Epistemology, Reviews and Interviews | Leave a comment

Philosophers’ Carnival #127

Welcome to the June 27, 2011 edition of Philosophers’ Carnival.  First those blog posts which were actually submitted will be listed, followed by blog posts which were gleaned.  If you submitted a good post that was not included, please know there … Continue reading

Posted in Carnival, Norris' Epistemology, Reviews and Interviews | 23 Comments

Philosophers’ Carnival call for submissions

I’ll be hosting the next Philosophers’ Carnival on June 27 (submit by June 25).  Email submission if need be. . Some topics I’d like to see in the submissions: How can an objectively true moral ‘ought’ correspond to the ‘is’ of reality? … Continue reading

Posted in Carnival, Euthyphro Dilemma, Gettier Problem, Golden Rule, Is-Ought Fallacy, Justified True Belief, Natural Law and Divine Command, Norris' Epistemology, Predestination, Reviews and Interviews, Sam Harris | Leave a comment

Central Valley location of first CAA chapter

Have you heard of Christian Apologetics Alliance (CAA) yet? CAA is a recently formed group of Christian bloggers started by Scott Rachui (The Christian Worldview) and Chris Reese (Cloud of Witnesses). The Central Valley is the location of CAA’s first … Continue reading

Posted in Apologetics | Leave a comment

I will return to this every morning until I become it.

Let my heart be your dwelling placeIndwell me, dwell in my heartLet me find my acceptance in youand share your acceptance with othersWe cannot deserve or earn what we already haveEspecially when at an impasse–Let my will be your willLet … Continue reading

Posted in Apologetics | 1 Comment

Why Sam Harris’ "objective moral truth" hovers over an abyss…

Let x be any concept that refers.  See Jime’s comment here for background on Sam Harris’ use of the word “objective”. P1:  Every possible meaning of x is subject to change unless there is a being to which an unchanging … Continue reading

Posted in Examiner.com Articles, Sam Harris | 4 Comments