Encourage:
-
Recent Posts
-
Past President of The Christian Apologetics Alliance
Apologetics Daily
my goodreads profile
Categories
- Apologetics
- Apologetics Toolbox
- Epistemology
- Ethics & Metaethics
- God Particle
- Groothuis' 'Christian Apologetics'
- Keller's Reason for God
- Ontological Argument
- Predestination
- Richard Dawkins
- Sam Harris
- Stephen Law's evil god argument
- Testimonies
- Tim McGrew
- Undesigned Coincidences
- William Lane Craig
- Youth Apologetics
- Bible Narrative Project
- Carnival
- Examiner.com Articles
- Freelancing Tips and Tricks
- Harmonic Triads
- Inventions
- Memories
- Neighboring
- News
- Poetry and Fiction
- Random
- Reviews and Interviews
- Apologetics
Archives
Meta
Category Archives: Epistemology
Answering Jerry Coyne and Jason Thibodeau on the Euthyphro Dilemma
Maryann, Matt, Tom and Jerry (missing: Jason) I’m writing this blog post to get in on the most recent Euthyphro Dilemma dilemma between atheist biologist Jerry Coyne and my fellow Christian Apologetics bloggers Matt Flannagan of MandM and Tom Gilson … Continue reading
Outside the Box: on the ‘extended mind’ hypothesis by Christopher Norris
Philosopher Christopher Norris, whose book Epistemology is discussed here on Ichthus77, has granted me permission to post the following as a guest post and enter it into the most recent Philosophers’ Carnival. It was written a couple weeks back and … Continue reading
Philosophers’ Carnival #127
Welcome to the June 27, 2011 edition of Philosophers’ Carnival. First those blog posts which were actually submitted will be listed, followed by blog posts which were gleaned. If you submitted a good post that was not included, please know there … Continue reading
Philosophers’ Carnival call for submissions
I’ll be hosting the next Philosophers’ Carnival on June 27 (submit by June 25). Email submission if need be. . Some topics I’d like to see in the submissions: How can an objectively true moral ‘ought’ correspond to the ‘is’ of reality? … Continue reading
New Philosophers’ Carnival is…
here. It features my book discussion of Christopher Norris’ Epistemology.
Norris’ Epistemology book discussion.
Christopher Norris The following has all been moved from here. Norris’ Epistemology; starting point, updates Norris’ “Epistemology” Intro. I Norris’ “Epistemology” Intro. II Norris’ “Epistemology” Intro. III Norris’ “Epistemology” Intro. IV Norris’ “Epistemology” Ch1.I Norris’ Epistemology Ch1.II-III Norris’ Epistemology Ch2.I Norris’ “Epistemology” … Continue reading
Questions regarding first chapter of Craig’s "Reasonable Faith"
I want to start by saying I’m a huge fan of William Lane Craig and recently met him at a fairly local Reasonable Faith conference. I had almost finished reading On Guard when the conference began and have since completed … Continue reading
God (is) the Golden Rule (ought) without offending Hume
Would very much appreciate some feedback on this. I have tried to put all of it in my own words without referring to influential sources. Clearly some of it needs more reasons (like the GR’s presence in every major culture/religion, how … Continue reading
Open letter to William Lane Craig regarding April 7 debate with Sam Harris
[ Reposting from Friday. ] I know you are a seasoned apologist but wondered if you will be using Hume’s is-ought fallacy, and Harris’ appreciation of correspondence theory, to question Harris on what his real ought corresponds to in reality, … Continue reading
Natural law, divine command and Euthyphro’s dilemma resolved
…using Hume’s is-ought distinction’s mirror concept, the ought-is distinction***. Euthyphro’s dilemma: “Is the pious loved by the gods because it is pious? Or is it pious because it is loved by the gods?” This can be reworded to read “Is … Continue reading
Ichthus77 