Category Archives: Epistemology

Harmonic Triads Reference, Current Index

This index is not exhaustive, but current: The first fallacy: Ought-Value or Action-Quality Conflation On the impossibility of knowing a true tenseless fact without omnitemporality (read all the comments) Elaborating on C Theory Logic Venn (of Opposition/Reconciliation) C Theory of Time & the … Continue reading

Posted in Epistemology, Ethics & Metaethics, Harmonic Triads, Is-Ought Fallacy, Justified True Belief | 3 Comments

The first fallacy: Ought-Value or Action-Quality Conflation

The first fallacy in philosophy, and not just the philosophy of ethics, is neither just the is-ought fallacy, nor just the failure to respect the fact-value distinction, but the fallacy of confusing the former for the latter: conflating oughts and values. This is relevant across every field, not just ethics, because it boils down and adds up to confusing action and quality. Together with the is/fact (substance) element from the first two fallacies, these three elements constitute the is-ought-value distinction, or the substance, action, quality triad. All three are required to obtain true, justified belief (knowledge) about anything, in any field of philosophy (including all the sciences). They are required together, but distinctly. One cannot stand in for either of the others.

But let’s begin in the field of ethics… Continue reading

Posted in Divine Essentialism, Harmonic Triads, Is-Ought Fallacy, Justified True Belief | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Jesus’ “State of the Kingdom” Address

Jesus’ “State of the Kingdom” Address: Good News of the Kingdom: Costly Grace https://a.co/d/6iE6IbX These are the words of Jesus found in the Gospels (Matthew, Mark, Luke/Acts, and John), and in Paul’s first letter to the Corinthian church, with only … Continue reading

Posted in Apologetics, Ethics & Metaethics, Faith, Golden Rule, Natural Law and Divine Command, Neighboring, Problem of Evil & Hell, The Gospel | Leave a comment

Elaborating on C Theory

“The end is hypothetical while you are advancing towards or falling away from it. The end is hyperthetical once you have reached it.” (C Theory and the Venn of Import) That was END. Now let’s talk about NOW, relative to … Continue reading

Posted in Apologetics, Divine Essentialism, Epistemology, Euthyphro Dilemma, Gettier Problem, Harmonic Triads, Is-Ought Fallacy, Justified True Belief | Leave a comment

C Theory of Time & the Venn of Import

First, an introduction of C Theory and the Venn of Import, then an explanation of how C Theory is distinct from and resolves conflicts arising from A and B theories, using the Venn (or Harmonic Triad) of Import. This is … Continue reading

Posted in Divine Essentialism, Golden Rule, Harmonic Triads, Is-Ought Fallacy, Justified True Belief, Predestination | Tagged , | Leave a comment

“Euthyphro”-type Dilemma of Language Ability and Learning

Does what is encoded (the pious/good) get our attention, or is it that what we attend to (the loved/valued) gets encoded? Continue reading

Posted in Epistemology, Euthyphro Dilemma, Gettier Problem, Golden Rule, Is-Ought Fallacy, Justified True Belief | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Harmonic Triads

Very, embarrassingly rough draft at time of sharing. Begun 9/28/2021.

Posted in Epistemology, Ethics & Metaethics, Harmonic Triads, Justified True Belief | Leave a comment

#Good: Still thinking about QoW #379

Hi Dr. Craig. Still chewing on QoW #379. I keep coming back to this video, especially Q & A, especially 01:01:07 & context … do you address Aquinas & divine simplicity (as relates to the rest of my question below) … Continue reading

Posted in Apologetics, Epistemology, Ethics & Metaethics, Euthyphro Dilemma | Leave a comment

Ethics & Morality

Below is a collection of my thinking on the grounding and justification of moral truth. I am warming up for something. Divine Essentialism God wills it (right) because He is good — essentialism. 1/4/08 (Not mine. Precursor.) The Sword and the … Continue reading

Posted in Apologetics, Divine Essentialism, Euthyphro Dilemma, Gettier Problem, Golden Rule, Groothuis' 'Christian Apologetics', Is-Ought Fallacy, Justified True Belief, Keller's Reason for God, Moral Argument, Natural Law and Divine Command, Richard Dawkins, Sam Harris, William Lane Craig | 3 Comments

Reply to WLC’s answer to my question regarding anti-realism (QoW #379)

I am saving my reply here, as it is already getting buried. Dr. Craig, thank you for answering my question. I am glad you are a realist about the Good and concede *that* much to the realist. Do you actually … Continue reading

Posted in Norris' Epistemology, Reviews and Interviews, William Lane Craig | Leave a comment