Observations on the finale of Fringe

The Observer known as “September”

So tonight was the (correction:  fall) finale of Fringe, named Wallflower for an invisible man, but probably also calling attention to Peter taking a less active roll in this particular multiverse by making Lincoln more attractive to Olivia (with a new pair of glasses?!).  Anyway…  How will they be able to prove this is not an entirely different Olivia, and is actually just an Olivia that has forgotten her relationship with Peter (as the Observer, named September, said at the end of last season)?  Ah, so tragic if such proof is impossible.   He’s giving her away…

And I still have questions remaining from ‘last’ season’s finale and am losing hope that they will be resolved.  Why rescue Peter as a child (so that he could go on to fulfill his purpose) only to later wipe him from the timeline (because he fulfilled his purpose)since, after wiping Peter from the timeline, the purpose was still fulfilled, and he was never even necessary (right?)?  (Not saying I think Peter was actually unnecessary…fictionally speaking.)  And after having a discussion with some fans on Fringe’s Facebook page, I have to ask:  Which is the real mess-upthat Walter found the cure, or that Peter fell through the ice?!

Regarding purpose (Peter’s, yes—but purpose in general)—who are the Observers to decide how things should go and who is important?  “August” shows they are mortal, and their past failure to distract Walter from curing Peter, and their recent failure to completely erase Peter, show they are fallible, not to mention inconsistent.   NOT that erasing Peter would be a good thing.

I’m beginning to think it’s not ‘supposed’ to make sense—it’s just supposed to make you toss around questions about what our purpose is and whether it is ‘natural’ (part of the ‘course’ of the universe or whatever Being for which that may be a metaphor) or artificially manipulated (by a time-transcendent Observer, or by yourself—caring for someone).  It’s all very Sartre, all very Socrates’ dialogue with Diotima on love, and with Euthyphro on the good.  Can’t wait for the season to resume in January…

Advertisements

About Maryann

Maryann Spikes is the past President of the Christian Apologetics Alliance. She blogs at Ichthus77, and loves apologetics and philosophy. In particular she loves to study all things Euthyphro Dilemma and Golden Rule. A para-educator (autism) for five years, she holds a Certificate in Christian Apologetics from Biola University, an AA in Humanities via Modesto Junior College, and moonlights as a freelancer. You can follow her on Twitter @Ichthus77, connect with the Ichthus77 community on Facebook, or look her up on Google+.
This entry was posted in Divine Essentialism, Euthyphro Dilemma, Natural Law and Divine Command. Bookmark the permalink.

Tell it:

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s