Category Archives: Apologetics

Norris, Gettier, Euthyphro, Hume and Plato: Is knowledge justified true belief?

[ Section on Gettier revised 1/7/11 ][ Mention of Euthyphro dilemma as applied to epistemology revised 2/23/11 ] When deciding whether knowledge is justified, true belief (Plato), a question arises: Is the truth of a belief 1) external to the … Continue reading

Posted in Divine Essentialism, Euthyphro Dilemma, Gettier Problem, Is-Ought Fallacy, Justified True Belief, Norris' Epistemology, Reviews and Interviews | 3 Comments

The Bible as a Narrative

Reposting from December of 2009, to update on new project: http://biblenarrativeproject.blogspot.com/ Check it out *** Update 1/1/11:  The Bible Narrative Project is complete and the 2011 study began today at the beginning of Genesis and Job and will be working through the … Continue reading

Posted in Apologetics, Apologetics Toolbox | Leave a comment

Replacing Agnosticism with Apisticism

This article argues we replace the word “agnosticism” (lack of knowing) with the word “apisticism” (lack of believing) on every belief scale.  The current debate between Myers and Coyne on the falsifiability of atheism is complicated by a misunderstanding of faith/belief as … Continue reading

Posted in Apisticism, Faith, Gettier Problem, Is-Ought Fallacy, Justified True Belief | Leave a comment

Dawkins, Craig and others debate: "Does the universe have a purpose?"

Matt Ridley, Michael Shermer, Richard Dawkins VS Rabbi David Wolpe, William Lane Craig, Douglas Geivett @La Ciudad de las Ideas 2010 I was wondering when Dawkins would talk about the science of morality, but he only mentioned it at the … Continue reading

Posted in Richard Dawkins, William Lane Craig | Leave a comment

Is-ought fallacy and knowledge as justified, true belief

The is-ought fallacy (Hume) is a real fallacy, and is why knowledge is justified, true belief (Plato). In order to be knowledge, a belief must both be justified by the evidence, and true by correspondence. If we consider justified a belief … Continue reading

Posted in Is-Ought Fallacy, Justified True Belief | Leave a comment

Philosophers’ Carnival 115

I had the priviledge of hosting a “Moral Landscape” edition of Philosophers’ Carnival here.

Posted in Carnival, Sam Harris | Leave a comment

The New, New Theism

Edited the fourth option on my scale 2/17/11. THE NEW, NEW THEISM (a bit of satire)followed by three versions of Dawkins’ belief scale, the final version being mine The theism of the New, New Theism is not a belief, but a … Continue reading

Posted in Apisticism, Faith, Golden Rule, Richard Dawkins | 5 Comments

Norris’ "Epistemology" Postscript, II

Book Discussion of Christopher Norris’ “Epistemology: Key Concepts in Philosophy” Concluding Scientific-Realist Postscript – Section II.After restating some things said in section I, Norris states that he has tried to represent opposing positions fairly, without caricature. The issue has been … Continue reading

Posted in Norris' Epistemology, Reviews and Interviews | Leave a comment

Norris’ "Epistemology" Postscript, I

Book Discussion of Christopher Norris’ “Epistemology: Key Concepts in Philosophy” Concluding Scientific-Realist Postscript – Section I. First-off, I can’t help thinking of Kierkegaard’s “Concluding Unscientific Postscript” when reading the title of this chapter, but Norris never overtly names him.Norris basically … Continue reading

Posted in Norris' Epistemology, Reviews and Interviews | Leave a comment

Norris’ "Epistemology" Ch5, VI

Book Discussion of Christopher Norris’ “Epistemology: Key Concepts in Philosophy” Chapter 5: Making for Truth: Some Problems with Virtue-Based Epistemology – Section VI.Grand finale for this chapter. One more chapter after this, with only two sections in it. Marie McGinn … Continue reading

Posted in Norris' Epistemology, Reviews and Interviews | Leave a comment