Author Archives: Maryann Spikes

Why is apologetics so important?

Caravaggio All the polls in the past few years show a rapid increase in those who have left their religion, and a rapid decrease in church attendance. Robert Putnam and David Campbell presented research showing “young Americans are dropping out … Continue reading

Posted in Apologetics, Apologetics Toolbox | 4 Comments

My first Wikipedia article: Graded absolutism

Edit…Graded absolutism From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to: navigation, search Philosophy (Plato, Confucius, Avicenna) Philosophers[show] Aestheticians · EpistemologistsEthicists · LogiciansMetaphysiciansSocial and political philosophers Traditions[show] Analytic · ContinentalEastern · IslamicPlatonic · Scholastic Eras[show] Ancient · MedievalModern · Contemporary Literature[show] Aesthetics … Continue reading

Posted in Apologetics | Leave a comment

The Bibliographical Test for New Testament Historicity (guest post)

The below was taken from Gospel 101 curriculum developed by Redeemer Church, Modesto.  Click on the image to get it on its own page. The bibliographical test seeks to determine the quantity and quality of documents, as well as how far removed … Continue reading

Posted in Apologetics, Apologetics Toolbox | Leave a comment

Good without God?

Under every billboard of the sort above, should be the following one (click to get it on its own page)…

Posted in Divine Essentialism, Euthyphro Dilemma, Evil as Privation of Good, Golden Rule, Is-Ought Fallacy, Natural Law and Divine Command | 2 Comments

WLC’s case for the resurrection

This is an attempt to give a brief case for the evidence of Jesus’ resurrection, gleaned from Dr. William Lane Craig’s “Reasonable Faith” and “On Guard”.   I tinkered w/ it only a bit.  One example is that I took from … Continue reading

Posted in Apologetics, Apologetics Toolbox, William Lane Craig | Leave a comment

Where I am at with Hume’s is-ought distinction

The Scottish philosopher David Hume (May 7, 1711-August 25, 1776) lays out the is-ought problem, in book III, part I, section I of his A Treatise of Human Nature (1739).  Hume says ought-statements are “entirely different” from is-statements and, in … Continue reading

Posted in Examiner.com Articles, Is-Ought Fallacy | 2 Comments

Why does Sam Harris’ "Moral Landscape" have the word "moral" in it?

I actually have ‘two’ questions (followed by a more important ‘third’ question). 1.  Why does Sam Harris’ “Moral Landscape” have the word “moral” in it? and… 2.  Why doesn’t its sub-title say “How science can likely determine human values”? Really, I … Continue reading

Posted in Examiner.com Articles, Sam Harris | 2 Comments

Outside the Box: on the ‘extended mind’ hypothesis by Christopher Norris

Philosopher Christopher Norris, whose book Epistemology is discussed here on Ichthus77, has granted me permission to post the following as a guest post and enter it into the most recent Philosophers’ Carnival.  It was written a couple weeks back and … Continue reading

Posted in Carnival, Norris' Epistemology, Reviews and Interviews | Leave a comment

Philosophers’ Carnival #127

Welcome to the June 27, 2011 edition of Philosophers’ Carnival.  First those blog posts which were actually submitted will be listed, followed by blog posts which were gleaned.  If you submitted a good post that was not included, please know there … Continue reading

Posted in Carnival, Norris' Epistemology, Reviews and Interviews | 23 Comments

Philosophers’ Carnival call for submissions

I’ll be hosting the next Philosophers’ Carnival on June 27 (submit by June 25).  Email submission if need be. . Some topics I’d like to see in the submissions: How can an objectively true moral ‘ought’ correspond to the ‘is’ of reality? … Continue reading

Posted in Carnival, Euthyphro Dilemma, Gettier Problem, Golden Rule, Is-Ought Fallacy, Justified True Belief, Natural Law and Divine Command, Norris' Epistemology, Predestination, Reviews and Interviews, Sam Harris | Leave a comment