Encourage:

-
Recent Posts
-
Past President of The Christian Apologetics Alliance

Apologetics Daily

my goodreads profile

Categories
- Apologetics
- Apologetics Toolbox
- Epistemology
- Ethics & Metaethics
- God Particle
- Groothuis' 'Christian Apologetics'
- Keller's Reason for God
- Ontological Argument
- Predestination
- Richard Dawkins
- Sam Harris
- Stephen Law's evil god argument
- Testimonies
- Tim McGrew
- Undesigned Coincidences
- William Lane Craig
- Youth Apologetics
- Bible Narrative Project
- Carnival
- Examiner.com Articles
- Freelancing Tips and Tricks
- Harmonic Triads
- Inventions
- Memories
- Neighboring
- News
- Poetry and Fiction
- Random
- Reviews and Interviews
- Apologetics
Archives
Meta
Author Archives: Maryann Spikes
Who is the point?
Why? Why do we care what is true, or what is true about what is good? What is the meaning of life, or what is the point? If we are always good (if that were possible), can we still miss … Continue reading
Posted in Apologetics
Leave a comment
On the impossibility of knowing a true tenseless fact without omnitemporality
TIME Q Posted on Equip / Reasonable Faith (also submitted as a question of the week) (Facebook discussion below) I recently took the Equip course on God‘s relationship to time and eternity. It was a great supplement to Dr. Craig’s … Continue reading
Posted in Apologetics, Harmonic Triads
15 Comments
Elaborating on C Theory
“The end is hypothetical while you are advancing towards or falling away from it. The end is hyperthetical once you have reached it.” (C Theory and the Venn of Import) That was END. Now let’s talk about NOW, relative to … Continue reading
C Theory of Time & the Venn of Import
First, an introduction of C Theory and the Venn of Import, then an explanation of how C Theory is distinct from and resolves conflicts arising from A and B theories, using the Venn (or Harmonic Triad) of Import. This is … Continue reading
“Euthyphro”-type Dilemma of Language Ability and Learning
Does what is encoded (the pious/good) get our attention, or is it that what we attend to (the loved/valued) gets encoded? Continue reading
Towards a JTB Ought-Is-Value Litmus
This is where I am at–work in progress: LITMUS KEY: [define the three imports] J (justified): OUGHT/ACT/DO: Ethico-existential (epistemic) import; Aristotle’s efficient cause. T (true): IS/FACT/BE: Ontologico-material (scientific/metaphysical) import; Aristotle’s material cause. B (belief): VALUE/-ATE/END: Hypo-/hyper-thetico-essential (aesthetic/teleological) import; Aristotle’s formal … Continue reading
Posted in Apologetics, Harmonic Triads
Tagged logical-fallacies, philosophy, psychology
Leave a comment







