Barcan, Buridan & Copilot walk into a ≡…

Here’s one for the logic nerds.

Background of the Schemata:

Barcan | Converse Barcan

Buridan | Converse Buridan

This Venn is a different way of presenting them, and there is a modified Barcan & Converse below it to show it is a correct presentation:


• Copilot:
possible pattern → existent act
(◇ → ∃)
• Converse Copilot:
existent act → possible pattern
(∃ → ◇)

I’ll leave the Copilot & Converse formulas for the logic nerds (hurry up —I’m about to do it myself).

Put ‘em all together (after you decode, of course)…


Trying it a different way…

Copilot gets what I’m saying & thinks it is possible to nix vacuous truth from the way logic has gone sideways.

I’m hopeful this can be done w/o new symbols.

#NoNewSymbols

#CommunicationNow

This entry was posted in Divine Essentialism, Euthyphro Dilemma, Harmonic Triads, Is-Ought Fallacy, Justified True Belief, Natural Law and Divine Command, Ontological Argument and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Tell it: